Educational content citing HUD 4000.1 and Fannie Mae Selling Guide. Rates, limits and program eligibility verified April 2026 and change frequently. Consult a licensed lender before applying.
CLVFHA

3% Down Conventional vs 3.5% Down FHA

Conventional programmes permit 3% down via Conventional 97, HomeReady, or Home Possible. FHA requires 3.5%. On a $300k home that is a $1,500 cash difference. The bigger question is what happens after closing: PMI duration vs MIP duration.

The 3 conventional 3% programmes

ProgrammeMin FICOIncome capFTHB required
Conventional 97 (Fannie)620NoneYes (at least one borrower)
HomeReady (Fannie)62080% AMINo
Home Possible (Freddie)660 (Adv) / 700 (AUS)80% AMINo

Cost stack on a $300k home, 680 FICO

LineFHA 3.5% downConv 97 (3% down)HomeReady (3% down)
Cash down$10,500$9,000$9,000
Base loan$289,500$291,000$291,000
UFMIP$5,066$0$0
Annual MI0.55%0.85%0.55% (HomeReady reduced)
MI durationLife of loanCancels ~yr 11Cancels ~yr 11
10-yr MI cost~$15,800 + UFMIP~$22,000~$14,200
30-yr MI cost~$47,520 + UFMIP~$24,500~$15,800

At 680 FICO, HomeReady is structurally cheapest if income qualifies. Conventional 97 ranks second on 30-year math. FHA wins only at short holds or if HomeReady is unavailable and FICO drops below 660.

The half-percent down payment difference

$1,500 in extra down payment on a $300k home is roughly 0.5% of the price. It matters for cash-strapped buyers but rarely changes the verdict between FHA and conventional. The PMI vs MIP cost difference compounds to $5,000 to $30,000 over a typical hold. Optimise for that, not the half-point cash difference.

Rate disclaimer

PMI factors vary by insurer. HomeReady PMI rates may differ between MGIC, Radian, Essent, and Enact. Consult a licensed loan officer.

Sources

Related: 5% down | HomeReady vs Home Possible vs FHA

Updated 2026-04-27